Header1200x385

× Welcome to the IREX question and answer forum. Please feel free to post your questions but more importantly also suggest answers for your forum colleagues. Bob himself or one of the other tutors will get to your question as soon as we can.

Errata candidate

  • Posts: 152
  • Thank you received: 20

Bosi72 created the topic: Errata candidate

Hello BT,
Probably not a big deal, but noticed a misalignment between ERC L6 and chart on page 147.
Latest ERC L6 May-2020 does not have W145, route Telfer-Marble Bar.
Photo attached.
Cheers
#1
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 152
  • Thank you received: 20

Bosi72 replied the topic: Errata candidate

Here is another one, or I could be missing something..

Page 156, YTNG does have AWIS and METAR both published in DAP and TAF, yet shaded alternate and book text doesn't subtract 100ft from 1556ft minima..

However, the next page 157, YGDI doesn't have AWIS nor METAR in DAP and TAF, yet the book suggest to use 1056ft instead 1156ft.

Please let me know where am I wrong? Thanks
#2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Stuart Tait

Stuart Tait replied the topic: Errata candidate

G'day Bosi

Thanks for your feedback we'll amend the ERC and the YTNG questions as for question 3 please see the included graphic



Cheers
#3
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 2477
  • Thank you received: 266

bobtait replied the topic: Errata candidate

Although ATIS and AWIS are approved sources for obtaining the actual QNH, they are not the only ones. An operator can obtain approval for his base to give the actual QNH via a company frequency. Also some aerodromes have AWIS available via mobile phone. In the case of mobile phones, you cannot use that method for flight planning because you cannot assume that you will have mobile coverage at the destination, but you can use the phone after you arrive to reduce the MDA by 100ft.

Bob
#4
The following user(s) said Thank You: Bosi72

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 152
  • Thank you received: 20

Bosi72 replied the topic: Errata candidate

Thanks Stuart
I assumed "Assuming" was the catch.
All good :)
Cheers
#5

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 152
  • Thank you received: 20

Bosi72 replied the topic: Errata candidate

Hi Stuart
page 173, paragraph 1 at the bottom of page "... alternate minima 1087 and 4.4 for Brisbane only..."

DAP has new minima 1135.

Regards
#6
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Stuart Tait

Stuart Tait replied the topic: Errata candidate

Thanks Bosi it never ends I'll amend that paragraph really appreciate the feedback

Cheers
#7

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.165 seconds