Header1200x385

facebook_page_plugin
× Welcome to the IREX question and answer forum. Please feel free to post your questions but more importantly also suggest answers for your forum colleagues. Bob himself or one of the other tutors will get to your question as soon as we can.

SI LOC visibility at Oakey - pg 294 of book

  • rdarby
  • Topic Author

rdarby created the topic: SI LOC visibility at Oakey - pg 294 of book

Hi

The example on page 294 is about Oakey, and flying a LOC approach. It says you can descend to 1990 or 1890 as these are the MDA's for the SI-LOC approach.

But then the text says that since no HIAL is installed you should use the visibility of 3.7km.

Now I understand that if you are doing a 2D approach (which a LOC on its own is) you should add 900m to the visibility. But the text specifically says if the HIAL is not available, not that it doesn't exist in the first place.

So are you saying if HIAL is there but off, use 3.7lm plus 900m, but if HIAL isn't installed in the first place you can use the lower published?
#1

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 2447
  • Thank you received: 257

bobtait replied the topic: SI LOC visibility at Oakey - pg 294 of book

According to my copy of the book, the text says that "If you check ERSA you will find that Oakey has no HIAL on Runway 14". That's not the same that it does have HIAL but it is unserviceable. If HIAL has never been installed, the published visibility already accounts for that, so there is no need to add .9 to the visibility.
#2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.069 seconds