Bob I've still got a little bit of your book to go so maybe these are answered, but I can't sleep till I ask
![:S :S](/media/kunena/emoticons/dizzy.png)
Perdantic questions I know, but hey.
Firstly CAO 40.2.1 para 11.3
So if you haven't flown any of these approaches in the preceding 90 days, you could still plan to fly them at your destination if VMC is forecasted right? Probably pointless in the real world I guess, but say if you have an autopilot that can carry out the GNSS approach, and it's not IMC, would it still be legal to carry out this approach?
Also talking purely in legal terms. I'm guessing your planned runway must satisy all alternate minimum requirements, as well your recency. For example there's no use using the special mimimum for two ILS if you're not current to use them etc. Also if you had something like where all requirements were met on your planned runway, except the runway only had permanent lighting with no standby power, where as the other runway had standby and automatic circuit switching, but exceeded crosswind maximums by a couple knots, technically you need an alternate. In otherwords one runway must meet ALL requirements, regardless.
Thanks