The Australian Aviation Theory Forum is a place for student pilots to ask questions, discuss CASA theory exams and share knowledge about RPL/PPL, CPL, IREX and recreational aviation study.
That's what I would have thought. Maybe the instructor telling me all this, was just trying to get me to think. The guy in the linked article below...
Awesome! Thanks Bob
Haha, yep, I should have thought about that before writing conservative. Thanks for the light clarification. ???? Matthew
Thanks Bob. I still would have thought that 1500 would override both the 4.4% and 2.5% missed approach gradient visibility, if the runway lighting ...
Thanks Bob. Must be a never ending catchup game.
Thanks Stuart. Got it. I think. I've tried to compile the requirements, to help me. Are these right? [u]IFR Alternates - Aids.[/u] MOS 91 8.08 ...
Hi Stuart. Regarding page 155. The book and online version list 2x (E)TSO 129 GNSS, but the last paragraph next to the chart plate on page 155 says...
[quote="anonymous post=9507 userid=3940"]You could use the S-I GNSS minima for Runway 14 since it is less than the VOR minima, the 146 GNSS units may ...
Excellent. Thanks for the clarification. What will CASA use in the exam, if a question says the eta will be at such and such a time?
Thanks Bob. I think I have it. Essentially it's the same thing. The example questions are taking the Track Error, which also includes the drift and...
[quote="Stuart Tait post=15185 userid=68"]G'day French I'm not sure your alright with my reply, maybe this decode of TAF's will help you out. ...