Thanks Jase I'll have to get the latest chart to amend the question
Yes should be (d) the explanation was obviously switched I've amended that answer to correct that error Appreciate the feedback
Thanks again for that I've amended the answer to reflect that
Thanks for that I've amended the answer to reflect that
G'day Your assumption is correct and it appears to be a left over question from CAO 20.16. that has slipped though I'll amend the question to refl...
Welcome and enjoy your journey
we can't produce an extract as the amount of references are excessive to be able to cut down the existing documents, So we have decided to not produce...
G'day Phil I've updated the extracts to the latest version in force, so if there were any discrepancies they won't be an issue. Couldn't have b...
G'day Phil I'm going to contact Gavin with this query and get his feedback as I feel the CAO's should be included in the permitted materials list ...
Congratulations Ravi on the result I can assure you that the fuel requirements are the same as in the book. As for the study guides use both V...
Good Morning Phil The repeal you reference was not complete as CASA hasn't finalised the legislation and certain CAR's and CAO's are still in forc...
G'day Ravi The 1800m becomes relevant when the preceding aircraft is heavier than 2000kg to help mitigate wake turbulence
Congratulations that is no small effort self studying the entire CPL you should be rightfully proud of yourself. All the best with IREX Che...
G'day Tim You are correct, I'm amazed no one else has picked that, that graphic has been like that for quite a while. It should read 1725 I'...
I've rectified that as well, please note that they are screenshots of the legislation, and it's a big job to keep up. Really appreciate it wh...