Air Law and IREX ex...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Air Law and IREX extracts

6 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
2,986 Views
(@stuarttait)
Estimable Member Customer
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 197
Topic starter  

 The Air Law and IREX extracts will be released as soon as the  official versions of CASR Part 91, the Part 91 MOS, Part 135 and
Part 135 MOS are available on the Federal Register of Legislation.



   
Quote
(@user6538)
Active Member Customer
Joined: 9 hours ago
Posts: 5
 

Any advice of whether we should take in the current/old extract or take all the legislation (as listed as permitted material) in separately for the CPL Air Law exam? Looking at taking the exam in the next week.

Thanks



   
ReplyQuote
(@user6509)
Eminent Member Customer
Joined: 9 hours ago
Posts: 15
 

I'm choosing to take in full copies - You can just print the full Part 61CASR, 91 MOS, 135 MOS.
My choice is mostly because of the index - make it very easy to find the appropriate section and subsection in each of these documents, also just about everything can be found in these sets. I have decided budget is not an issue for me with this exam so @ approx $30 each I think they are good value - from office works printed and bound accordingly



   
ReplyQuote
(@user6070)
New Member Customer
Joined: 9 hours ago
Posts: 1
 

Hi there,

Is the latest IREX extracts sufficient and applicable for use in the CLWA?



   
ReplyQuote
(@stuarttait)
Estimable Member Customer
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 197
Topic starter  

Short answer no, we have decided to not produce a Air Law extract as it wouldn't be any smaller than the current instrument.

The IREX extract is not comprehensive enough for CLWA.



   
ReplyQuote
(@user6736)
New Member Customer
Joined: 9 hours ago
Posts: 1
 

I noticed that there are some missing sections in the IREX extract, for example the bottom half of page 49 to top half of page 50 in the Part135 MOS, and on page 57 of the Part135 MOS..
Another example as I can recall is the cockpit compartment light requirements clause.

Was this intentional?



   
ReplyQuote
Share: